Why is language being de-gendered to avoid upsetting a small minority of trans people when it upsets most women?


“WHAT is a woman?” I asked Dame Joan Collins a few weeks ago on my new show Piers Morgan Uncensored.

“What is a woman?” she repeated in disbelief. “ME!”

Piers believes the use of waking language violates women's rights


Piers believes the use of waking language violates women’s rights
Piers with Joan Collins at Piers Morgan Uncensored - his guest reacted in disbelief when asked:


Piers with Joan Collins at Piers Morgan Uncensored – his guest reacted in disbelief when asked: ‘What is a woman?’Photo credit: erotem

I burst out laughing because it really is that simple.

A woman is an adult female human…like Joan Collins.

Yet we now live in such a ridiculously woken world that even top British politicians and US Supreme Court justices cannot answer this simple question for fear that the mob of trans activists will cancel it.

Slowly but surely, society has bowed to this linguistic tyranny, doing potentially irreparable harm to women’s rights in the process.

The attention-seeking, sex-obsessed idiots of Love Island are killing me
Forget slimy Andy and ghastly Meghan & Harry - celebrate our remarkable queen

It has gotten to the point where women in positions of authority are saying things that 20 years ago would have locked them in an institution for being completely insane.

The principal of the private Burgess Hill Girls School in West Sussex has just announced that she will no longer call her pupils “girls” because there are “so many gender options”.

Additionally, Liz Laybourn said she might also stop using the word “daughter” when writing to parents — who have paid large sums of money specifically to send their girls to an all-girls school — if it offends them.

However, the name of her school remains Burgess Hill Girls.

And on the school’s website, the first thing you see is a letter from Ms. Laybourn, which begins: “Our mission at Burgess Hill Girls is to develop your daughter into one of the women of tomorrow.”

As such, she likes to use gendered language to trick people into parting with large sums of money to send her girls to her girls-only school, but then refuses to use it when the girls actually attend school.

Have you ever heard anything so absolutely ridiculous?

This descent into language frenzy reached a shocking low with news that the NHS has dropped the word ‘women’ from its key online health advice for women being treated for cervical, womb and ovarian cancer.

This is despite the fact that ONLY women born from female biological bodies suffer from these diseases because only women have cervix, uterus and ovaries.

Watch Piers Morgan Uncensored weekdays on Sky 526, Virgin Media 627, Freeview 237, Freesat 217 or on Fox Nation in the US

The English NHS website previously described ovarian cancer as “one of the most common types of cancer in women”, but now it says: “Anyone with ovaries can get ovarian cancer, but it mainly affects people over 50.”


It’s not “anybody”, it’s women.

People who screened for cervical cancer were told, “Cervical cancer develops in a woman’s cervix (the entrance to the uterus from the vagina).” Now they are told, “Cervical cancer is a cancer found anywhere in the cervix.”

This silent and sinister de-sexing only came to light when the NHS website’s advice on miscarriage was changed to say: “Losing three or more pregnancies in a row (recurrent miscarriages) is uncommon and only affects around 1 in 100 people.”

Persons? No, it affects 1 in 100 women!

It was quickly changed again after an inevitable outcry, but how much of this is still being done without the media noticing?

Last month it was revealed that midwives were ordered by the government not to use expressions like “breastfeeding” or “vaginal birth” to avoid distressing transgender people. Instead, they were encouraged to use the phrases “breast feeding” and “frontal or underbirth.”

The effects of this PC c**p are potentially harmful

Anyone care about the heartache this PC c**p might cause women with boobs and vaginas (spoiler alert: they’re all women)?

Like so much bright, virtual signal junk, the impact of this linguistic de-gendering on our healthcare system is potentially very damaging.

like dr Karleen Gribble, from Western Sydney University, told the Times: “The desex language changes are well intentioned but we see that they make communication less clear and when it comes to critical health issues this has great potential to improve health place and welfare of vulnerable individuals.”

Of course.

There are already serious problems with poorer non-English speaking or low literacy patients who already find it difficult enough to follow health advice and are not seen on time as a result – and some tragically die.

Removing the word “women” from the manual will, of course, make it even more difficult for these women to follow.

It is therefore inevitable that screening rates will fall even further than they have been up until now and that lives will be at risk.

This madness will also directly impact trans patients, who since last year can request an entirely new set of medical records with all reference to their biological sex removed in favor of their own self-declared gender identity.

This should make them feel more “inclusive”.

But ironically, it’s dangerously exclusive because it means health conditions specific to their biological sex can be overlooked entirely.

This is a war on women and their rights

Trans men (biological women) do not receive screening invitations for early detection of female-specific diseases as they are now categorized as male, and trans women (biological men) do not receive screenings for male-specific diseases as their medical record categorizes them as female.

GPs have apparently been left to alert their trans patients to their gender screenings, but how many doctors will take the time out of their already-crammed schedules to actually do so?

Should there be any doubt that this is a war on women and their rights, the men’s health pages on the NHS website specifically refer to ‘men’ and ‘male’ in advice for conditions such as testicular and prostate cancer.

This is about the purest form of sexism you could ask for, coming from an organization that ridiculously claims to do all of this in the pursuit of fairness and equality.

The bottom line is: why is the language being de-gendered so as not to potentially upset a tiny minority of trans people when it so obviously upsets the vast majority of women who just wish to continue being called women or girls?

Where are YOUR rights to having their titles not wiped out because an angry, usually male trans activist is hysterically demanding it and threatening to remove anyone who doesn’t agree?

So I applaud Health Secretary Sajid Javid for finally taking a stand and saying enough.

Women are women and that is never more important than when it comes to their health.

The NHS website has removed the reference to the word'women' in some cases


The NHS website has removed the reference to the word ‘women’ in some cases
Burgess Hill Girls School in Sussex, whose headteacher has announced she will no longer refer to pupils as


Burgess Hill Girls School in Sussex, whose headteacher has announced she will no longer refer to pupils as “girls”.Credit: Kent News and Pictures

https://www.the-sun.com/news/5577765/language-de-gendered-trans-people-piers-morgan/ Why is language being de-gendered to avoid upsetting a small minority of trans people when it upsets most women?


Daily Nation Today is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – admin@dailynationtoday.com. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button