After a number of seasons of assorted individuals vying for the Iron Throne based mostly on the declare of correct succession, some fans were confused as to why Cersei was in a position to take the throne with none objection from the individuals or the lords and women of Westeros. Based on the established guidelines of the road of succession, Cersei doesn’t seem to have a reputable cause to take a seat on the throne.
Succession is extraordinarily on the planet of “Game of Thrones,” because it serves as the principle driver for Daenerys’s mission to rule, as her home dominated for hundreds of years earlier than being usurped by Robert Baratheon, and he or she believed it was her birthright. Stannis Baratheon (Stephen Dillane) additionally laid declare to the throne based mostly on succession, claiming (appropriately) that his brother Robert’s youngsters have been truly the bastard merchandise of incest from Cersei and her brother Jaime (Nikolaj Coster-Waldau). After all, Robert Baratheon did create a precedent that usurping the throne by pressure was a sound path to ruling Westeros.
One other potential rationalization for this sudden ignorance in direction of the principles of succession is that the individuals most certainly to protest Cersei’s ascent to energy — the Religion and the Tyrell home — have been simply blown up by Cersei earlier within the episode. The individuals of King’s Touchdown absolutely would additionally protest this new ruler, as they clearly hated Cersei sufficient to abuse and humiliate her on her “walk of shame,” however that very same explosion of the Sept of Baelor in all probability struck sufficient worry in her topics to permit Cersei to do as she pleases.
https://www.looper.com/660533/why-cerseis-storyline-makes-no-sense-in-game-of-thrones/ | Why Cersei’s Storyline Makes No Sense In Recreation Of Thrones