PRINCE Andrew’s bid to throw out his intercourse accuser’s courtroom case has sparked fury — after his authorized group branded her a “money-hungry intercourse kitten”.
His “assault canine” agency additionally claimed Virginia Giuffre had even fashioned a part of billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s intercourse abuse ring by turning into “head b*tch” to trafficked women.
The attorneys mentioned not solely did she assist Epstein’s alleged confederate Ghislaine Maxwell in procuring victims, however she was solely suing Andrew for “one other payday”.
Ms Giuffre’s lawyer Sigrid McCawley hit again yesterday: “If she had stood silent within the face of outrageous statements like Prince Andrew churns out routinely, the decades-long intercourse trafficking ring his buddy Jeffrey Epstein operated would by no means have been uncovered.
“With reference to cash, let’s be clear — the one social gathering to this litigation utilizing cash to his profit is Prince Andrew.”
It additionally emerged yesterday that 61-year-old Andrew’s ex-wife Sarah Ferguson and daughters Beatrice and Eugenie might be quizzed by Ms Giuffre’s legal professionals over his feedback in his car-crash BBC Newsnight interview.
Ms McCawley added: “Frankly, it was very useful for us.” Mum-of-three Ms Giuffre’s lawsuit, filed in August, claims she was he sexually assaulted by Andrew in London, New York and the Caribbean.
His legal professionals filed a “movement to dismiss” the civil case in New York on Friday night.
His LA-based legal professional Andrew Brettler requested for a listening to with US District Choose Lewis Kaplan to argue for dismissal.
As a substitute, he demanded that Ms Giuffre, 38, present “a extra definitive assertion of her allegations”.
In a 36-page memorandum Mr Brettler, from the agency Lavely and Singer, mentioned: “For over a decade Giuffre has profited from her allegations towards Epstein and others by promoting tales and images to the Press and getting into into secret agreements to resolve her claims towards her alleged abusers, together with Epstein and his ex-girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell.
“Most individuals may solely dream of acquiring the sums of cash that Giuffre has secured for herself over time.
“This presents a compelling motive for Giuffre to proceed submitting frivolous lawsuits towards people akin to Prince Andrew, whose sullied repute is barely the most recent collateral injury of the Epstein scandal.”
Mr Brettler mentioned Andrew “unequivocally” denied her “false allegations”.
He wrote: “Accusing a member of the world’s greatest identified royal household of great misconduct has helped Giuffre create a media frenzy on-line and within the conventional Press.
“It’s unlucky, however simple, that sensationalism and innuendo have prevailed over the reality.
“Giuffre has initiated this baseless lawsuit towards Prince Andrew to realize one other payday at his expense and on the expense of these closest to him.
“Epstein’s abuse of Giuffre doesn’t justify her public marketing campaign towards Prince Andrew.”
Mr Brettler mentioned Ms Giuffre — who has fought authorized instances towards Epstein, Maxwell and lawyer Alan Dershowitz — had a sample of lawsuits “towards quite a few high-profile people”.
For over a decade Giuffre has profited from her allegations towards Epstein and others by promoting tales and images to the Press and getting into into secret agreements to resolve her claims towards her alleged abusers
He argued Ms Giuffre’s abuse claims had grown extra “lurid” because the years have gone on.
He added: “She has sought to hawk more and more salacious and inconsistent accounts of alleged sexual abuse by associates, enterprise associates, and mere acquaintances of Epstein and Maxwell.”
Underneath the heading “Giuffre’s function in Epstein’s prison enterprise”, he mentioned she had been accused of recruiting younger women for Epstein in return for cash.
She had been “slowly climbing the ladder” of his intercourse trafficking operation, he claimed.
He wrote she was purchased “costly diamond jewelry, furnishings and designer clothes” and went on purchasing sprees with Maxwell.
The lawyer additionally quoted her as saying she was being paid properly by Epstein – who killed himself in jail in 2019 — as a result of she would “give him intercourse every time he needed it”.
He referred to an article within the New York Day by day News wherein her ex-boyfriend Philip Guderyon described her because the “head b*tch” who had as much as ten women she would deliver to Epstein.
The identical article included the road that Ms Giuffre was not held as a slave, however was a “money- hungry intercourse kitten, who flashed her money and loved the finer issues in life”.
The sister of one other former boyfriend of Ms Giuffre’s was quoted in Andrew’s courtroom papers as saying: “She would say to me, ‘Have you learnt any women who’re type of slutty?’.”
Brettler mentioned Ms Giuffre’s allegations towards Prince Andrew had been “inconsistent” and her lawsuit was devoid of any particulars of particular intercourse offences.
The lawyer added that she “doesn’t allege any info demonstrating that she didn’t consent to any purported sexual contact with Prince Andrew”.
The Duke, pictured together with his arm round Ms Giuffre in 2001, has mentioned he has no recollection of ever assembly her.
Either side will focus on the following steps within the case at a listening to in New York on Wednesday.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/3967509/prince-andrew-sex-kitten-legal-team-sex-accuser/ | Prince Andrew’s authorized group model his intercourse accuser Virginia Guiffre a ‘money-hungry intercourse kitten’