EMILY Ratajkowski has ditched her bra and is wearing a completely sheer lace dress instead.
The Inamorata founder took a solo stroll through the streets of New York.
Emily, 32, exposed her nipples as she walked around the Big Apple without a bra.
The “Gone Girl” actress highlighted her slim figure as she donned a plunging V-neck dress.
The sheer lace dress featured a floor-length greenish skirt that reached her ankles.
Emily parted her long brunette hair down the middle as she strutted in strappy high heels.
YOUR LAUNCH PARTY
This isn’t the only time the Entourage alum has gone braless in the city that never sleeps.
On August 6, the supermodel attended the launch party for her denim collection at the Highlight Room at Moxy NYC Lower East Side.
Emily shined under a light denim jacket held together with two buttons.
She wore dark, high-waisted jeans with slits on the wide leg and showed off her denim pumps.
Most read in the entertainment category
While dressed to the nines, the fashion mogul posed and smiled for the cameras.
The Sports Illustrated swimsuit model has teamed up with fashion company AG to launch her denim line.
Your new line will contain several different ones stylesincluding denim jackets, jeans, coats, tank tops, shirts and more.
AT THE BEACH
The London-born model shares her two-year-old toddler Slyvester with her ex-husband Sebastian Bear-McClard, 46.
On September 4th, the My Body author went to the beach with her little one.
The mother of one took to her Instagram Stories and shared photos from her day at the beach.
Slyvester’s mother posted a picturesque snap of the sea at dusk.
The remnants of their campfire still burned as the blue sky faded to basic shades of yellow and red.
A lone sailboat hovered on the distant horizon as the ocean waves rippled as day turned to night.
The actress posted another beach photo showing the mother-son duo on the water’s edge.
Emily and Sylvester were captured in silhouette as they posed near the shore and the approaching waves.
Her swimsuit disappeared onto her skin as the photo left her in shadow against the sparkling sea and bright beach.
However, fans disagreed that Sylvester’s presence in her snaps wasn’t necessary.
One critic argued: “Using your baby in your sexualized images is another form of trash.”
Another critic criticized: “The first thing I think of when she shows her child in seductive photos. Pretty sick, to be honest.”